Als eine der wichtigsten Verbraucherschutzorganisationen Deutschlands informiert der Bund der Versicherten e. V. (BdV) regelmäßig über Entwicklungen im privaten Versicherungsbereich sowie über relevante Gesetzesänderungen.
Sie sind Medienvertreter*in und möchten regelmäßig unsere Pressemitteilungen erhalten? Dann schicken Sie eine E-Mail an email@example.com, damit wir Sie in unseren Verteiler aufnehmen können.
BdV and Zielke Research recently presented a common study on the current situation of German life insurers. The study is based on the so-called Solvency and Financial Conditions Reports (SFCR), which had to be published by the insurers on EU-level this year for the first time. The results are poor. “The bad quality and non-sufficient transparency of some of these reports are troubling”, Kleinlein, Spokesman of BdV, points out. Besides the issue of the financial resources of the companies, the study analyzes statements on benefit prospects, the management of surplus and the capital investments. “Our conclusion is that there is an urgent need for action for nearly all companies”, Kleinlein emphasizes. The results of this study including the analyzed key figures can be downloaded – for free – from the website of BdV.
Transparency is one of the three basic pillars of the new supervisory regime. That is why BdV and Zielke Research took this aspect particularly into consideration. From this perspective “Alte Leipziger” and “Öffentliche Lebensversicherung Berlin-Brandenburg” have to be seen positively, but “Debeka”, „Karlsruher“ and „Württembergische“ in a particularly negative way. With regard to the latter, Kleinlein critizises: “A company which informs only in a non-transparent way infringes one of the three main principles of the new supervisory regime.” Accusations that the new solvency reports would not allow for reliable comparisons are refuted by Kleinlein: “Quite differently as assumed by parts of the industry and by the German financial supervisory authority, the new solvency reports allow for an analysis of the conditions of each life insurer.”
The crucial issue of the solvency reports is the analysis whether the companies possess enough solvency capital, in other words: do they have sufficiently large capital reserves? “It is worrying that 23 companies have to make use of the transitional measures in order to fulfill the solvency requirements at all”, Kleinlein declares. But the benefit prospects being analyzed are worrying, too. “With regard to 13 companies even the business model itself must be questioned, because these companies expect future losses”, following to Kleinlein. Related to capital investments the companies have very different portfolios. “The industry seems to have avoided mistakes of the past with regard to partial aspects of capital investments, e.g. to state bonds”, as Kleinlein resumes this partial aspect.
BdV is very satisfied with the cooperation of Dr. Carsten Zielke. “Dr. Zielke is a tough analyst who now is our partner elucidating the necessary facts in an objective manner”, Kleinlein states. However there are differences related to the evaluations of the results. “Dr. Carsten Zielke evaluates the results from the point of view of an analyst, but we do it from the point of view of the consumers”, Kleinlein explains possible differences.
The analysis does not only comprehend a tabular representation of the results, but an evaluation of partial aspects by BdV via a simple red-yellow-green-scheme. “If a company proves appropriate values related to one criterion from our perspective, than we award a green light. But if we discover an urgent need for action, there will be a red light. A yellow light indicates room for improvements”, Kleinlein points out. The single evaluations of Dr. Zielke are published as texts additionally.
The results, tables and explanations can be downloaded here. “Explicitly we offer all figures as tables, because we would like to encourage all those who are interested in them making their own analysis”, Kleinlein stresses.